Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
|
group_modelling:abstract_lubia_karine [2009/03/19 13:20] lubia |
group_modelling:abstract_lubia_karine [2009/03/19 13:22] lubia |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| for interoperable geo service standards is the Open GeoSpatial Consortium (OGC). Currently, the OGC has | for interoperable geo service standards is the Open GeoSpatial Consortium (OGC). Currently, the OGC has | ||
| defined dozens of abstract and implementation specifications. Several of them deal with spatio-temporal | defined dozens of abstract and implementation specifications. Several of them deal with spatio-temporal | ||
| - | data, but is something missing? | + | data, but is there something missing? |
| With this motivation, this work aims to evaluate if and how existing web service specifications, such as | With this motivation, this work aims to evaluate if and how existing web service specifications, such as | ||
| Sensor Observation Service (SOS), Web Feature Service (WFS), Web Coverage Service (WCS), Web Processing Service (WPS), | Sensor Observation Service (SOS), Web Feature Service (WFS), Web Coverage Service (WCS), Web Processing Service (WPS), | ||
| Open Location Service (OpenLS) and Sensor Planning Service (SPS), deal with spatio-temporal | Open Location Service (OpenLS) and Sensor Planning Service (SPS), deal with spatio-temporal | ||
| information. The main goal is to assess them by considering the aspects the supported spatio-temporal data and operations, usability and compliance of existing implementations. | information. The main goal is to assess them by considering the aspects the supported spatio-temporal data and operations, usability and compliance of existing implementations. | ||
