Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
interimage:examples:example4 [2011/08/16 17:20] rsilva |
interimage:examples:example4 [2011/08/16 17:35] rsilva |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| * tijuca.tif | * tijuca.tif | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| Line 57: | Line 59: | ||
| {{interimage:examples:example4_8.png|Selecting an operator}} | {{interimage:examples:example4_8.png|Selecting an operator}} | ||
| * Save the project and re-execute the interpretation. | * Save the project and re-execute the interpretation. | ||
| + | * The aim of this step was to show how the reliability values affect the interpretation process. Basically, if two polygons are competing for the same image region, the one with the higher reliability value will prevail. In this case, we had this priority list: 1. //Shadow//, 2. //Vegetation// and 3. //Non-vegetation//. | ||
| + | * Now, try to change the reliability value of the //Vegetation// node to 0.5. Save the project and re-execute the interpretation. By doing it, we are taking the //Vegetation// class to the front of the list. Here is a comparison between the two results: | ||
| + | {{interimage:examples:example4_9.png|Result with the first priority list}} -> {{interimage:examples:example4_10.png|Result with the second list}} | ||
