Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
encontros_e_eventos:r_models_in_the_web [2009/03/18 15:37] inpeifgi |
encontros_e_eventos:r_models_in_the_web [2009/03/19 15:44] (current) inpeifgi |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| One assumption of sharing models is that we are able to create models using in this case R and afterwards are able to publish them. In this master thesis, the student will investigate how an executable R model can be deployed as Web Processing Services (together with | One assumption of sharing models is that we are able to create models using in this case R and afterwards are able to publish them. In this master thesis, the student will investigate how an executable R model can be deployed as Web Processing Services (together with | ||
| - | all relevant input data and input constraints). The context we are looking at are where data are spatial and/or spatio-temporal and/or temporal, being served over OGC web services (SOS/WFS/WCS,...) and that there is an interest in re-executing the R model e.g. for a new geographical location or region, or for a new moment in time or over a new period of time. | + | all relevant input data and input constraints). The context we are looking at are where data are spatial and/or spatio-temporal and/or temporal, being served over OGC web services (SOS/WFS/WCS,...) and that there is an interest in re-executing the R model e.g. for a new geographical location or region, or for a new moment in time or over a new period of time. A challenge is to find a generic way to map input data specified as OGC web service requests to their respective R data structures, and to pass the R model output to the WPS process. |
| + | |||
| + | * Supervisor: Edzer Pebesma | ||
| + | * Contact Person (IFGI): ? | ||
| + | * Contact Person (INPE): ? | ||
| (added by pat; extended by edzer) | (added by pat; extended by edzer) | ||
