Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
encontros_e_eventos:semantic_annotations_for_models [2009/03/17 15:50] inpeifgi |
encontros_e_eventos:semantic_annotations_for_models [2009/03/19 16:42] (current) inpeifgi |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== Models and Semantic Annotations ====== | + | ====== PhD: Models and Semantic Annotations ====== |
| - | added by pat | + | |
| - | (and potentially a Master Topic Idea) | + | === Responsible... === |
| + | * Supervisor: Werner Kuhn (not yet confirmed) | ||
| + | * Contact Person (IFGI): | ||
| + | * Contact Person (INPE): | ||
| + | * Responsible Student: | ||
| + | === Outline === | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Objectives / Potential Tasks | ||
| + | * Ontologies capturing different aspects / types of models | ||
| + | * Semantics of required parameters (data, ICs) | ||
| + | * Implementation of “Model Web” components supporting annotation, publication, and retrieval of models | ||
| + | Mobility Measure: IFGI → INPE | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Idea === | ||
| Semantically annotating the geographic information (in the sense of geospatial data) has been investigated at IFGI, but we did not yet much consider the dynamic dimension of GI. In the following paper we discuss how the notion of semantic annotations can be applied to executable models deployed as web services (as underlying assumption). We illustrate the methodology, and discuss how we can query models (and which particular properties of models would be interesting to query for). | Semantically annotating the geographic information (in the sense of geospatial data) has been investigated at IFGI, but we did not yet much consider the dynamic dimension of GI. In the following paper we discuss how the notion of semantic annotations can be applied to executable models deployed as web services (as underlying assumption). We illustrate the methodology, and discuss how we can query models (and which particular properties of models would be interesting to query for). | ||
| We should consider different model types as examples (agent-based model vs. monte carlo vs. numerical model). | We should consider different model types as examples (agent-based model vs. monte carlo vs. numerical model). | ||
| - | Questions which should be discussed in this extended abstract: | + | Some of the questions which could be discussed in this PhD: |
| * What is our understanding of a model? | * What is our understanding of a model? | ||
| * What are the common properties of models? | * What are the common properties of models? | ||
| Line 17: | Line 28: | ||
| * What different types of queries should exist to query for model outcome? Walk through the queries. | * What different types of queries should exist to query for model outcome? Walk through the queries. | ||
| * How can we build user interfaces which abstract from these queries? | * How can we build user interfaces which abstract from these queries? | ||
| - | + | | |
