Diferenças

Aqui você vê as diferenças entre duas revisões dessa página.

--- geopro:pedro:mobility:revisao-jasss [2008/07/03 20:34] – pedro
+++ geopro:pedro:mobility:revisao-jasss [2008/07/03 20:36] (atual) – pedro
@@ Linha 34: / Linha 34: @@
 There are two negative aspects to emphasize:
- There is not any justification for the hypothesis of the model.
+There is not any justification for the hypothesis of the model.
- About which class of individuals or content are the authors thinking?
+About which class of individuals or content are the authors thinking?
- Really I don't know any that can be approximated by the kind of agent and game
+Really I don't know any that can be approximated by the kind of agent and game
- presented here.
+presented here.
- No spatial or mobility information is obtained from the results of the
+No spatial or mobility information is obtained from the results of the
- model. When I read the title 'Games on Cellular Spaces: How Mobility Affects
+model. When I read the title 'Games on Cellular Spaces: How Mobility Affects
- Equilibrium', thought to find information as the agents are grouped or
+Equilibrium', thought to find information as the agents are grouped or
- repelled spatially,  or perhaps somewhat about the mean path. The only
+repelled spatially,  or perhaps somewhat about the mean path. The only
- information is the number of movements carried out for each category of
+information is the number of movements carried out for each category of
- player.
+player.
 The first criticism can be met by adding in the introduction section the ideas
 that guided the author to propose this type of dynamics. If it is possible,
 justify what type of society or behaviour tries to shape with this play.
 The second can be part of a future work; I believe that the cellular space