geopro:pedro:networks
Diferenças
Aqui você vê as diferenças entre duas revisões dessa página.
Ambos lados da revisão anteriorRevisão anteriorPróxima revisão | Revisão anterior | ||
geopro:pedro:networks [2008/06/05 17:41] – pedro | geopro:pedro:networks [2009/03/30 17:10] (atual) – pedro | ||
---|---|---|---|
Linha 15: | Linha 15: | ||
* **social distance:** the shortest number of steps between 2 persons in a network. | * **social distance:** the shortest number of steps between 2 persons in a network. | ||
* **Fruchterman-Reingold algorithm**: | * **Fruchterman-Reingold algorithm**: | ||
+ | * **Boolean network:** a set of Boolean variables whose state is determined by other variables in the network. They are a particular case of discrete dynamical networks, where time and states are discrete, i.e. they have a bijection onto an integer series. Boolean and elementary cellular automata are particular cases of Boolean networks. | ||
=====Motivation===== | =====Motivation===== | ||
Linha 54: | Linha 55: | ||
- | ====The Architecture of Complexity==== | ||
- | |A. Barabazi, 2007| IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 33:33-42| [[http:// | ||
- | {{ http:// | ||
- | ====The Spatial Structure of Networks==== | ||
- | |M. T. Gastner and M. E. J. Newmann, 2006| European Physical Journal B 49, 247-252| | ||
- | \\ | ||
- | |||
- | **Abstract: | ||
- | that **there are strong signatures in these networks of topography and use patterns, giving the networks shapes that are quite distinct from | ||
- | one another and from non-geographic networks**. We offer an explanation of these differences in terms of the costs and benefits of | ||
- | transportation and communication, | ||
- | well the qualitative features of the networks studied. | ||
- | |||
- | Internet and airline networks are not really two-dimensional at all, but the road network is. | ||
- | |||
- | | | ||
- | ^vertices | ||
- | ^edges | ||
- | ^diameter | ||
- | ^degree of the vertices | ||
- | ^peaks on the distribution | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | Why do not use cities as vertices of a highway instead of intersections, | ||
- | |||
- | Future work: the effects of population distribution on the networks, and vice-versa. | ||
- | |||
- | ====Collective dynamics of `small-world' | ||
- | |Watts, D J and Strogatz, S H, 1998| Nature | ||
- | |||
- | \\ | ||
- | |||
- | **Abstract: | ||
- | |||
- | \\ | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ====The Strength of Weak Ties==== | ||
- | |M. S. Granovetter| Americal Journal of Sociology, 1973 78(6) 1360-1380| [[http:// | ||
- | {{ http:// | ||
- | \\ | ||
- | |||
- | **Abstract: | ||
- | |||
- | \\ | ||
- | |||
- | **The strength of a tie is a (probabily linear) combination of the amount of time, the emotional intensity, the intimacy (multual confiding), and the reciprocal services which characterize the tie.** Ties are strong, weak, or absent. The stronger the tie between A and B, the larger the proportion of S to whom they will both be tied. The hypothesis is made plausible also by empirical evidence that the stronger the tie connecting two individuals, | ||
- | |||
- | In the figure, A-B is a local bridge of degree 3 (above), and of degree 13 (below). As higher is the degree, stronger is the bridge. By the same logic used above, only weak ties may be local bridges. | ||
- | |||
- | Tells about the problem of a participant observation to get information of a fairy restricted circle, and therefore do not take into account the weak ties. | ||
Linha 120: | Linha 70: | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | + | ====Scale-free network of a dengue epidemic==== | |
- | + | |E Massad, S Ma, M Chen, C J Struchiner, N Stollenwerk, M Aguiar, 2008| Applied Mathematics and Computation 195:376–381| [[http:// | |
- | ====Geographic routing in social networks==== | + | |
- | {{ http:// | + | |
- | |D Liben-Nowel, J Novak, R Kumar, P Raghavan, and A Tomkins, 2005|PNAS 102(33) 11623–11628| [[http:// | + | |
\\ | \\ | ||
- | **Abstract: | + | **Abstract: |
- | information about a target individual, people can successively forward a message along such a chain. Experimental studies have | + | transmission as the 2000–2005 outbreaks progressed. This scale-free network of cluster comprised geographical breeding |
- | verified this property in real social networks, and theoretical models have been advanced to explain it. However, existing | + | places for the aedes mosquitoes, acting as super-spreaders nodes in a network of transmission. The geographical organization |
- | theoretical models have not been shown to capture behavior | + | of the network |
- | relating geography and social-network | + | hypothesis is that the distribution |
- | to the number of closer people. In a large social network, we show that one-third | + | evolved towards a power law as the epidemic intensity progressed until 2005. |
- | and the remainder exhibit the proposed relationship. Further, we prove analytically that short chains can be discovered in | + | |
- | every network exhibiting | + | |
\\ | \\ | ||
- | |||
- | at first blush, geographic location might have very little to do with the identity of a | ||
- | person’s online friends, but Fig. 3A verifies that geography remains crucial in online friendship. | ||
- | Although it has been suggested that the impact of distance is marginalized by communications technology | ||
- | (26), a large body of research shows that proximity remains a critical factor in effective collaboration and that the negative impacts of | ||
- | distance on productivity are only partially mitigated by technology (27). However, for distances larger than 1000 km, the | ||
- | curve approximately flattens to a constant probability of friendship between people, regardless of the geographic distance between them. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ====Social and Geographic Distance in HIV Risk==== | ||
- | |R. Rothenberg and S. Q. Muth and S. Malone and J. J. Potterat and D. E. Woodhouse, 2005| Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 32(8)506–512| | ||
- | |||
- | {{ http:// | ||
- | |||
- | {{ http:// | ||
- | |||
- | **Objective: | ||
- | between social distance (measured as the geodesic, or shortest | ||
- | distance, between 2 people in a connected network) and geographic | ||
- | distance (measured as the actual distance between them in kilometers | ||
- | [km]). | ||
- | |||
- | **Study:** We used data from a study of 595 persons at risk for HIV | ||
- | and their sexual and drug-using partners (total N 8920 unique | ||
- | individuals) conducted in Colorado Springs, Colorado, from 1988 to | ||
- | 1992—a longitudinal cohort study that ascertained sociodemographic, | ||
- | clinical, behavioral, and network information about participants. We | ||
- | used place of residence as the geographic marker and calculated | ||
- | distance between people grouped by various characteristics of interest. | ||
- | |||
- | **Results: | ||
- | of 4 km or less. The closest pairs were persons who both shared needles | ||
- | and had sexual contact (mean 3.2 km), and HIV-positive persons | ||
- | and their contacts (mean 2.9). The most distant pairs were prostitutes | ||
- | and their paying partners (mean 6.1 km). In a connected | ||
- | subset of 348 respondents, | ||
- | 6 steps from each other in the social network and were separated by a | ||
- | distance of 2 to 8 km. Using block group centroids, the mean distance | ||
- | between all persons in Colorado Springs was 12.4 km compared with | ||
- | a mean distance of 5.4 km between all dyads in this study (P < | ||
- | The subgroup of HIV-positive people and their contacts was drawn in | ||
- | real space on a map of Colorado Springs and revealed tight clustering | ||
- | of this group in the downtown area. | ||
- | |||
- | **Conclusion: | ||
- | urban group of people at risk for HIV provides demonstration of the | ||
- | importance of geographic clustering in the potential transmission of | ||
- | HIV. The proximity of persons connected within a network, but not | ||
- | necessarily known to each other, suggests that a high probability of | ||
- | partner selection from within the group may be an important factor in | ||
- | maintenance of HIV endemicity. | ||
Linha 242: | Linha 136: | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
====A network economic model for supply chain versus supply chain competition==== | ====A network economic model for supply chain versus supply chain competition==== | ||
Linha 252: | Linha 147: | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ====Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness==== | ||
+ | |M. Granovetter, | ||
+ | |||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Abstract: | ||
+ | questions of social theory. This paper concerns the extent to which economic action is embedded in | ||
+ | structures of social relations, in modern industrial society. Although the usual neoclassical | ||
+ | accounts provide an " | ||
+ | economics who attempt to bring social structure back in do so in the " | ||
+ | criticized by Dennis Wrong. Under- and over socialized accounts are paradoxically similar in their | ||
+ | neglect of ongoing structures of social relations, and a sophisticated account of economic action | ||
+ | must consider its embeddedness in such structures. The argument is illustrated by a critic of | ||
+ | Oliver Willamson' | ||
+ | |||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | FIXME Checar a veracidade: the behaviour of individuals cannot be explained except in terms of their | ||
+ | interaction with other individuals known to them. Individuals being influenced by other individuals | ||
+ | without slavishly imitating them. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====Capturing Social Embeddedness: | ||
+ | |B Edmonds, 1999| Adaptive Behaviour 7:323-348| [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Abstract: | ||
+ | intended as a strong type of **social situatedness**. It is defined as the extent to which modelling the | ||
+ | behaviour of an agent requires the inclusion of other agents as individuals rather than as an | ||
+ | undifferentiated whole. Possible consequences of the presence of social embedding and ways to check | ||
+ | for it are discussed. A model of co-developing agents is exhibited which demonstrates the possibility of | ||
+ | social embedding. This is an extension of Brian Arthur’s ‘El Farol Bar’ model, with added learning and | ||
+ | communication. Some indicators of social embedding are analysed and some possible causes of social | ||
+ | embedding are discussed. It is suggested that social embeddedness may be an explanation of the causal | ||
+ | link between the social situatedness of the agent and it employing a constructivist strategy in its | ||
+ | modelling. | ||
+ | |||
+ | \\ | ||
geopro/pedro/networks.1212687716.txt.gz · Última modificação: 2008/06/05 17:41 por pedro