group_modelling:abstract_lubia_karine
Diferenças
Aqui você vê as diferenças entre duas revisões dessa página.
Próxima revisão | Revisão anterior | ||
group_modelling:abstract_lubia_karine [2009/03/19 16:03] – created inpeifgi | group_modelling:abstract_lubia_karine [2009/03/19 16:22] (atual) – lubia | ||
---|---|---|---|
Linha 6: | Linha 6: | ||
// | // | ||
Some examples are physical processes like temperature and volcano eruption, moving objects | Some examples are physical processes like temperature and volcano eruption, moving objects | ||
- | like animal | + | like animal and iceberg movement |
on the ocean. This spatio-temporal data is generated by different technologies, | on the ocean. This spatio-temporal data is generated by different technologies, | ||
and mobile geosensors, GPS and Earth observation satellites or radio-frequency identification | and mobile geosensors, GPS and Earth observation satellites or radio-frequency identification | ||
- | (RFID) and can be distributed | + | (RFID) and can are stored as distributed data sources. In order to analyze |
| | ||
the variation of distance between two moving objects over time and extraction of time series of | the variation of distance between two moving objects over time and extraction of time series of | ||
a specific location or area. | a specific location or area. | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | In this context, service oriented architecture is a good option to create | + | In this context, |
- | frameworks in order to handle distributed spatio-temporal data sources. | + | distributed spatio-temporal data sources. |
- | aims to evaluate if and how existing web service specifications, | + | for interoperable geo service standards is the Open GeoSpatial Consortium (OGC). Currently, the OGC has |
- | Service (SOS), Web Feature Service (WFS), Web Coverage Service (WCS), Web Processing Service (WPS), | + | defined dozens of abstract and implementation specifications. Several of them deal with spatio-temporal |
+ | data, but is there something missing? | ||
+ | With this motivation, this work aims to evaluate if and how existing web service specifications, | ||
+ | Sensor Observation Service (SOS), Web Feature Service (WFS), Web Coverage Service (WCS), Web Processing Service (WPS), | ||
Open Location Service (OpenLS) and Sensor Planning Service (SPS), | Open Location Service (OpenLS) and Sensor Planning Service (SPS), | ||
- | information. The main goal is to assess them by considering the following | + | information. The main goal is to assess them by considering the aspects |
- | supported spatio-temporal data and operations, usability and compliance of existing | + | |
- | implementations. | + |
group_modelling/abstract_lubia_karine.1237478617.txt.gz · Última modificação: 2009/03/19 16:03 por inpeifgi