Diferenças

Aqui você vê as diferenças entre duas revisões dessa página.

--- interimage:examples:example4 [2011/08/16 20:29] – rsilva
+++ interimage:examples:example4 [2011/08/16 20:59] (atual) – rsilva
@@ Linha 17: / Linha 17: @@
   * tijuca.tif
@@ Linha 59: / Linha 63: @@
   * Save the project and re-execute the interpretation.
   * The aim of this step was to show how the reliability values affect the interpretation process. Basically, if two polygons are competing for the same image region, the one with the higher reliability value will prevail. In this case, we had this priority list: 1. //Shadow//, 2. //Vegetation// and 3. //Non-vegetation//.
-  * Now, try to change the reliability value of the //Vegetation// node to 0.5. Save the project and re-execute the interpretation.
+  * Now, try to change the reliability value of the //Vegetation// node to 0.5. Save the project and re-execute the interpretation. By doing it, we are taking the //Vegetation// class to the front of the list. Here is a comparison between the two results:
+{{interimage:examples:example4_9.png|Result with the first priority list}} -> {{interimage:examples:example4_10.png|Result with the second list}}
+  * Sometimes, it can be interesting to know how this decision process takes place. Let's see what happened to the original //Shadow// polygons by adding this information to the visualization window.
+  * Select the //Selection// tab and click the //Add// button. Fill the fields according to the image below then click //Save//.
+{{interimage:examples:example4_11.png|Adding a Selection layer}} -> {{interimage:examples:example4_12.png|Adding a Selection layer}}
+  * By using the visualization tools you can compare which //Shadow// regions remained and which were discarded.
+{{interimage:examples:example4_13.png|Comparing the polygons}}